Talk:Bipartisan Cafe/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 22:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Review to come.

@Another Believer: Excellent work. Just a few comments:

• Refs 55 looks like it's for the wrong restaurant.
  • Fixed. Good catch! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
• The history section should be reorganized chronologically and the subsections removed.
  • I've tried to address your concern. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
• I think the section on Emerson's views should be removed and relevant in-scope information about how his views interact with the running of the restaurant should be folded into the history section. As written, the section is undue (15% of the article text per WP:PROSESIZE). If Emerson himself is notable, he should get his own article where his views can be described.
  • I've tried to address your concern. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
• I also don't think there's a great reason to separate out newspapers from other RSes that have reviewed the restaurant in the reception section. Although not necessary for GA, I think that section can also be reorganized a bit (perhaps thematically), and some of the block quotes can be paraphrased down.
  • I've tried to address your concern. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
• Not necessary for GA, but I fixed a bunch of refs during my edit. Make sure you're including author names and following MOS:CONFORMTITLE.

Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.