Talk:Bioreporter
Latest comment: 2 months ago by CoolieCoolster in topic "Too technical"
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
moved out of unassessed on the genetics project
edit1/15/17 DennisPietras (talk) 03:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
"Too technical"
edit@CoolieCoolster: Which concepts in this article are "too technical" for readers to understand? Jarble (talk) 16:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Mostly using uncommon terms without an explanation or—at the very least—wikilink, such as photoprotein, agent (in this context), vectors, and bioassays, among others. I would suggest using simpler language when possible, and either including wikilinks and/or context information when the terminology has no comparable alternatives. The structure of the article could also be improved so that the information is presented across multiple sections (rather than just subsections of 'Reporter gene systems'), along with the inclusion of a list of related articles in a 'See also' section. -CoolieCoolster (talk) 17:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)