Talk:Biology of depression
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Biology of depression article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Third ventricle hypothesis of depression page were merged into Biology of depression on September 25, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A part should be re-writed
editin Difficulty of gene studies, i think that this part should be re-writed as I dont understand it at all: However, as the number of genes reduces the likelihood of choosing a correct candidate gene, Type I errors (false positives) are highly likely. Huhiop (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Chemical Imbalance/Serotonin Hypothesis
editThe articles cited for the serotonin imbalance hypothesis of depression being scientific unsupported appear to be widely criticized as relying on flawed methodology and fundamental misinterpretations of multiple many factors contributing to depression. Many of these criticisms from experts in the field can be found on the nature journal page for the articles. Due to the possibility of misinforming the average person, these sources should be removed or at least be presented with 5e caveat that it is a highly controversial area and the supposed consensus against the serotonin theory is non existent. Exilehide (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)