Talk:Bilski v. Kappos

Impact

Could I kindly get some assistance from scholars in the field in writing a more complete and thorough Impact section of similar caliber to that in In re Bilski (which also needs updating)? -128.61.83.190 (talk) 04:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for getting the section started. I know I'll be keeping an eye out for the inevitable scholarly analysis of the opinion. Verkhovensky (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Redirect

I've updated the redirect Bilski to point to this article rather than to In re Bilski. I assume this is uncontroversial. TJRC (talk) 00:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

• I agree, that is the correct thing to do. bd2412 T 00:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Cite

the cite at the beginning of this article still has a blank for the page number. Doesn't someone have the correct cite by now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)