A fact from Billy Raimondi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced and neutral. Free of copyvios. Hooks are interesting and cited in the article. QPQ done. Great work! BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
BeanieFan11, thanks for the review! Do you mind reviewing the image that I just uploaded? Bowman trading cards from that era had their copyright expire. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Looks good, I'll pass the image as well. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Images are appropriately tagged; sources are reliable. I can't find any issues with the prose or anything else to complain about, so I'm passing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Article is new enough, long enough, well-sourced and neutral. Free of copyvios. Hooks are interesting and cited in the article. QPQ done. Great work! BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)