Talk:Billy Hughes egg-throwing incident

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Donama in topic Bad title

Motivation edit

Was the culprit ever identified or interviewed to confirm their motivation? Without that can we be confident enough to call this a protest and therefore add the appropriate category? - Shiftchange (talk) 05:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The culprit was Patrick Brosnan (with the possibility his brother Bartie Brosnan was also involved). There was loads of newspaper articles about the event, some highly exaggerated suggesting a major riot (such as Hughes' telegram), but this subsequent report of an inquiry into the incident seems to narrow it down to one or two eggs thrown by Patrick Brosnan (or possibly his brother Bartie Brosnan) who were interjecting during the pro-conscription speech by Hughes. It seems it was a planned protest against conscription (Brosnan came with eggs in his pockets to a publicised pro-conscription speech by Hughes). As this inquiry report indicates, egg throwing seems to have been a popular form of protest at the time including at other pro-conscription speeches. In 2007 relatives claimed their actions were a response to conscription introduced in Ireland in 1916 and that they were Sinn Fein sympathisers. But if you believe Conscription Crisis of 1918, there was no attempt to conscript the Irish until 1918 making it an unlikely motivation in Warwick in 1917. But nonetheless if they were Sinn Fein sympathisers, they would be unlikely to want to see Australia providing more troops in support of the British Army as it presumably suited Sinn Fein to have the British Army busy in Europe and thus be less able to retain control in Ireland. Kerry (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
In 1952 when Hughes died, Brosnan claimed he was opposed to conscription because "I didn't want to be conscripted". Kerry (talk) 00:08, 18 October 2015 (UTC)|Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Egg Throwing Incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Bad title edit

Title should be 'Egg-throwing incident (1917)'. Why the unnecessary caps? I doubt it was referred to with caps in 1917 unless in a newspaper headline. Donama (talk) 11:39, January 22, 2020 (UTC+10.5) (2020-01-22T11:39UTC+10.5)

Moved from Egg Throwing Incident (1917) to egg-throwing incident (1917). Donama (talk) 02:03, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply