Talk:Billy Hill (gangster)

WikiProject British Crime

• For those interested, a WikiProject regarding crime in Great Britain has been proposed. MadMax 19:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Spelling

An anonymous (sockpuppet?) user changed "burglarizing" to "burgling," claiming the former "is not a word."

Not only is "burglarizing" a word, it's the standard American English use, whereas "burgling" is the non-standard use, per Merriam Webster. "Burglarizing" also has a lengthy entry in the OED.

Notwithstanding 213.246.142.129 is an ISP from The Netherlands, where English is not the native language, perhaps 213.246.142.129 could, in the future, refrain from lecturing others on the proper use of the English language. sure but lets be honest,standard american english is not the queens english so bollocks. I have not changed the text back in the original entry, which I wrote BTW, as that would be a pointless "editing war."

But, 213.246.142.129, before you play "schoolmarm" again, you might want to crack a dictionary first. David Hoag 01:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

'Burgling', `burglar' and `burglary' are the correct words in British (& Irish, Australian and New Zealand) English. Would you call a burglar a `burglarizer' who committed many `burglarizations'? This article is about a British subject and British English seems to be appropriate. `Burglarizing' etc seems to be based on the principle that more educated speakers and writers use longer words, a `schoolmarmish' idea if ever there was one. Another example of polysyllabic syndrome being the incorrect use of `transportation' (an obsolete punishment by forced exile) for the correct form `transport'. The fact that an editor's ISP comes from the Netherlands is irrelevant as mother-tongue English speakers from the UK and elsewhere can enter the Netherlands as tourists, temporary or permanent residents, and English is the second language of many Dutch people, who speak it very well in many cases. Barney Bruchstein (talk) 21:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Official website=malware?

According to my webshield anyway. Anyone care to confirm? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.177.43.76 (talk) 10:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Billy Hill (gangster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205072127/http://www.billyhill.co.uk:80/ to http://www.billyhill.co.uk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)