I think there is some modest level of bias in this article.

edit

This article contends that the subject, Billy Bean, walked away from employment in major league baseball "in the prime of his career." I doubt the writer has a high level of expertise in evaluation of major league baseball events. In the history of major league baseball, there have been extremely few players who were still at the "prime" of their careers at age 32, and the small population of those who were so, primarily consisted of "superstar" players. None of them spent about 3 years out of major league baseball at approximately the age of 30, at which time in Billy Bean's life Mr. Bean presumably was playing baseball at the minor league level, attempting to earn a reversal of demotion and a new major league job -- which apparently he secured, at least temporarily (his 487 lifetime "at-bats" indicates a notably low level of actual playing time.) Baseball's respected empirical historian, Bill James, has documented the normal career arc of an athlete in baseball, reaching the peak of his physical abilities and on-field accomplishments around the age of 26 or 27, followed by declining skills, with the rate of decline sharply accelerating after the athlete's 30th birthday. The uncolored facts reported in the Billy Bean article, which admittedly the article does take pains to report, portray a baseball player c. 1995-6 struggling to hang on to the smaller part of his professional career. I believe that the author of the article has phrased the words, "in the prime of his career, Bean walked away from Major League Baseball," to create an effect that will portray Mr. Bean as a heroic figure who made a sacrifice (of an eminent careeer) out of concern from discovering a level of anti-homosexual prejudice in the workplace. I believe the phrasing betrays that the author of the article has some attachment to the article's subject, Mr. Bean, either as a human being, if the author actually knows Mr. Bean, or as a "Cause". I believe also it's important for authors of articles in this wiki-project to hyperlink the term LGBT to make sure to make the article helpful and self-explanatory to general-interest users of encyclopedias. 76.209.175.14 19:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

That section was a copy and paster from Mr Bean's biography on www.billybean.com (so no wonder it sounded so biased, and was unwikified). This is a copyright violation, and thus has been removed. Proto:: 10:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Bean99.jpg

edit
 

Image:Bean99.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply