Talk:Bike-engined car

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 1292simon in topic No reason to exclude non-production cars

No reason to exclude non-production cars edit

I don't have a problem with removing unsourced list items, but we have plenty of good sources, not to mention full articles, on the Westfield Megabusa and others listed here. Wikipedia has no special bias for or against production anything. Per WP:PRODUCT, production cars or other manufactured goods must have reliable sources and notability to merit articles. Being "production" isn't a special status on Wikipedia, and numerous production cars and motorcycle articles have been deleted at AfD for lack of sustained, in-depth coverage. Non-production goods aren't second-class. If there's sources, and notability to boot, it's good content. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 07:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the explanation. In hindsight, I agree that they are worth including. Sorry for removing them. Thanks for adding the extra references. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 09:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply