Talk:Biggar family

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Family article edit

I decided to describe the family and not the individuals, as their lives were closely linked, and would require a lot of repetition if described separately. The sons died at ages 18 and 25, and may not warrant independent articles. There are similar pages, like Kennedy and Booth family. JMK (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Michael Biggar (talk) 15:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)In the designation "Biggar Family" there is the assumption that there is only one family bearing that name. In fact there are many. I believe that it may be more appropriate to add a qualifier such as a city, region or country, among others.Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biggar family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply