Talk:Big business/Archives/2012

Latest comment: 13 years ago by ErikHaugen in topic Requested move


See Also List

There was a big list of See Also links (most of which did seem relevant) and now they are gone. Since the concept of "Big Business" is vague, it seems that a long list of See Also links is reasonable. 121.91.48.146 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

GM?

General Motors isn't really a good example anymore. I'm replacing it with toyota

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 05:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


Big BusinessBig business

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 04:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Support. Not a proper noun, should not be capitalised as such. Also, the majority of reliable sources do not treat capitalise it, especially in more recent times. Jenks24 (talk) 01:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.