Talk:Big Thunder Ski Jumping Center/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 08:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "Funding was then cut and he venue" - the

   Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

   Is Thor Hansen his brother?

   Source doesn't say, although it would seem natural. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

   "Lille Norway Ski Area. I" - do you know why it was named so?

   Source doesn't say. My guess is that the Hansens were Norwegian. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

   meters have to be converted with {{convert}}

   Done. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

   what are "in-runs"?

   I've link to the appropriate article which explains what it is. Any follower of ski jumping should know what it is so it would be unnatural to explain it inline, but I agree that a link should be in place. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: A few small fixes are needed

   Pass/Fail:

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Hope you enjoyed this oddity of Canadian history. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)