Talk:Big Painting No. 6/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• Lead is a bit short. Surely it can be expanded on further?
  • Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• It once set a record auction price for a painting by a living American artist. --> For how much?
  • fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• Big Painting No. 6 is in the Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen collection in Düsseldorf. --> Unsourced
  • ref added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• Not sure if details is the best title for the heading. Description, maybe?
  • Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• Critical commentary --> Reception
  • Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• I see no other issues with the article. It is well referenced and written.

• All issues addressed. Passing the article! Statυs (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Way too much copyrighted material in the footnotes. No excuse for this. Editor should have used his own words. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)