Talk:Big Mound Key-Boggess Ridge Archeological District

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Mound Key-Boggess Ridge Archeological District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions for Article Improvement

edit

This article is a good brief overview of Big Mound Key but there are several areas in which it could be improved. The article title includes Boggess Ridge as well as Big Mound Key yet the entire article focuses on Big Mound key with no mention of Boggess Ridge or Boggess Hole. Information should be added that addresses Boggess Ridge and explains the relationship between Boggess Ridge and Big Mound. The article states that the land was purchased by the state of Florida in 1978; however, no mention is made of who owned the land or how it was used prior to 1978. There is also lacking information about the major looting incident in 1981 and the steps that were taken to protect the site following this incident. The article mentions that George Luer led an extensive excavation of the site between 2008 and 2011 but there is no follow up that explains his findings or conclusions. There is limited information concerning the people who may have inhabited this site. There is also no effort to describe Big Mound Key and Boggess Ridge in the context of the peoples that inhabited the area but rather the article focuses on the modern context of the site. Modern place names are used to describe locations related to the site, rather than names that were used by the peoples who inhabited the area. Much of the information on the history of the site focuses on modern times rather than the 2,000 years of occupation of Big Mound. There is also no information on what happened to the people who inhabited this site, where they went, how late it was occupied, etc. Additional sources that could be useful include The Archaeology of Upper Charlotte Harbor, Florida published by the Florida Anthropological Society as well as Big Mound Key Near Charlotte Harbor, Florida also published by the Florida Anthropological Society. Hunterbrownfl (talk) 23:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Mound Key-Boggess Ridge Archeological District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply