 | Big Cave has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 10, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in California may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Big Cave/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs) 09:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I see that Tisquesusa has written some improvement but FAR away from a good article...
Imma ask what that means.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- There seems to be disagreement about the height of the volcano between sources; why is one height measure preferred? Source #1 probably needs explicit page links associated.
- I fixed the url for source 1. Which source differs on the height; they all seem the same to me? ceranthor 14:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- GVP gives a height of 4130ft. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Jo-Jo Eumerus - I didn't even catch the difference! Is it more clear now? ceranthor 15:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- GVP gives a height of 4130ft. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- I fixed the url for source 1. Which source differs on the height; they all seem the same to me? ceranthor 14:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- There seems to be disagreement about the height of the volcano between sources; why is one height measure preferred? Source #1 probably needs explicit page links associated.
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- See first part of 2c
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: I've replied to a few and fixed a few comments. Thanks for the review. ceranthor 14:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- Seems like this is done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus and Ceranthor: I archived a source here. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 21:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)