Talk:Bezerenbam and Mișelav

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 84.117.0.87 in topic Polish interpretation

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bezerenbam and Mișelav. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

worthless POV edit

might be, perhapps just oriental nights... without certainty it remains just POV --2A02:810D:4640:2238:C9B:EE5B:3E4:EB83 (talk) 16:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Polish interpretation edit

Recently I came across a source (Boyle,1971's translation of the Jāmiʿ al-tawārīkh) which cites Bretschneider,1888 and Pelliot, 1950's interpretations of Ïla'ut as the poles, Bzrndm(usually rendered Bezerenbam) as a corruption of Bolesław and Myšlaw(usually rendered as Mișelav) as a corruption of Mieczysław. Also noted is Minorsky,1952 who sees it as a corruption of Szászváros(Today Orăștie)

Now, I'm not sure when or even if the consensus on the identities of these two 12th century leaders changed, as these sources are quite old, but they surely deserve a mention in the article text, no? 84.117.0.87 (talk) 10:43, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply