Talk:Beverly Shores station

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Beverly Shores (NICTD station) vs. Beverly Shores South Shore Railroad Station edit

While the NICTD station is at the location of the National Register Historic Property site, they are not actually the same, as the building is not being used for the station. I proposed to create a second article for the historic site. When there isn't much information, a single article make sense. I'll make no change until after Sept 11, 2015. Unless comments to the contrary appear, I'll being the process then. --Chris Light (talk) 15:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to argue against. Yes, the building isn't being used now as part of the station, they have a shared history (since the platform and building were once parts of one unit). Both items are still linked to each other by context and since, as you say, there isn't much information, there's no reason to split. If anything, a nice history section should me made encompassing both. Lost on  Belmont 3200N1000W  (talk) 18:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beverly Shores station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply