Talk:Beta oxidation

Latest comment: 11 months ago by CHEM 300 UBC CJA in topic Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

{improve tomorrow and see what the weather looks good and good for you too as we have to go back home and take care and be careful and be done by the end of the week so I will have a great time with my parents to see you soon}

Untitled

edit

some more information on the activation energy required in starting off the breakdown of the initial energy would be helpful. I think it takes an ATP or something to start it off, but i dont know for sure.


ATP produced

edit

How can 1.5 molecules of ATP be produced Beta_oxidation#Energy_yield? Unless I have misunderstood the article, it describes each cycle as producing "14 ATP", broken down into halves of ATP molecules, and as I understand it each FADH2 carries sufficient electrons to produce 2 molecules of ATP while each NADH molecule carries sufficient electrons to produce 3 molecules of ATP. Thus either my incomplete understanding has led me astray, or the article needs clarifying/correcting. Any ideas?

Thanks, Yazza 21:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

This looks to be the result of using non-integer versus integer (classic) P/O ratios. Using non-classic or non-integer values for P/O ratio then per 2 electrons transfered to oxygen from FADH2 yields 1.5 ATP. Classic integer values for P/O ratio would yield 2 ATP. Non-integer P/O values have arisen from studies showing that cytochrome c oxidase pumps only 2 protons per 2 electron transfer whereas the classic, integer P/O ratio assumed 4 protons pumped.

Bahrens 23:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for being trivial, but the diagram is a bit weird. S is usually for Sulphur - clearly here it isn't but people get confused. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.202.56 (talk) 09:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

FA metabolism by brain cells

edit

There is evidence that the brain can use FA as well for its energy metabolism, for example here http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12843297

Meph636 (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Making it "easier"

edit

I would say the easiest way to explain it, is that beta oxidation breaks it into 2 carbon bits (known as CoA). It can then form acetyl CoA. 129.180.166.53 (talk) 06:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Definition of beta oxidation

edit

"Beta-oxidation is the process by which fatty acids, in the form of glucose molecules, are broken down in the cytosol to generate pyruvate, which enter mitochondria as acetyl-CoA, the entry molecule for the citric acid cycle." 1. fatty acids cannot be in the form of glucose molecules, 2. beta oxidation takes place in mitochondrial matrix, not in cytosol. 3. fatty acids are broken down to Acetyl-CoA, not to pyruvate, and not through pyruvate. 4. acetyl-CoA is already formed in mitochondria, it does not need to enter there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.116.72.200 (talk) 16:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply


Include a list of organs that are able to use this?

edit

Could be helpful to include. It would be helpful in the context of ketogenesis and ketoacidosis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.12.36.11 (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hyphenated or not?

edit

The title has "beta oxidation" nonhyphenated, whereas the article has "beta-oxidation" hyphenated. Which one is correct? CielProfond (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Confirmation that short chain fatty acids diffuse across inner membrane of mitochondria

edit

In the part of the article as follows,

"If the fatty acyl-CoA contains a short chain, these short-chain fatty acids can simply diffuse through the inner mitochondrial membrane.[3]"

reference [3] points to http://ajpgi.physiology.org/content/274/3/G518

That reference is about diffusion across the apical membrane of the epithelium in the digestive tract. It refers the diffusion across parts of the cell's membrane and not the mitochondrial parts of the cell. There is no mention in that reference that diffusion occurs across the inner membrane and into the cell's mitochondrial matrix, nor that it receives acyl-CoA that is derived from those SCFAs and therefore generates ATP from that.

The following is one page also refers to the diffusion, though I can not locate the reference to the Guzman and Geelan 1993 study that it refers to.

https://books.google.com.au/books?id=ULsbUPGYaVoC&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=short+chain+fatty+acids+diffuse+inner+membrane+mitochondria/&source=bl&ots=JDvvIa6T6K&sig=5yvKMv1O7LCjnEQWw2XAY0WxXLA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjMr_KTwKHLAhXMEpQKHRgDDO4Q6AEIKzAC#v=onepage&q=short%20chain%20fatty%20acids%20diffuse%20inner%20membrane%20mitochondria%2F&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.67.121.45 (talk) 08:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beta oxidation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Energy yield

edit

An anonymous user changed the energy yield numbers in this edit without providing a source. As discussed in the chat above, the non-integer values are more accurate and up-to-date.

In the process, I also reverted User:Snori's wikilink, but I've put it back, because WP:redlinks are good. --Slashme (talk) 12:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 7 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Abatra21, Sylee00 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Difei Shi, Ezpzii, CrayfishClarinetist, Melikajvn.

— Assignment last updated by CHEM 300 UBC CJA (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply