 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Speed of light
editIs there a reference for the Einstein / Speed of light reference? Benjicohn (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- The statement in the article is plainly incorrect. The 1922 eclipse was used to confirm Eddington's 1919 findings that supported Einstein's general relativity theory. (See tests of general relativity.) The speed of light had been reasonably well established by that time. Regards, RJH (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree. The observation in 1922 was in reference to the general relativity theory, not the speed of light. I cannot find the specific references, but certainly beta virginis was in the near vicinity of the eclipse path here, and could well have been one of the stars used in the observation. But again, this was in reference to the general theory of general relativity, not the speed of light. [[User:Sternmann~enwiki] 23 June 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sternmann~enwiki (talk • contribs) 16:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
I too was jarred by the claim this star was involved (as well as the assertion that the the speed of light was measured ... not ... and that Einstein measured it ... not) and removed it. Maybe someone misunderstood something they read, but with one certain and one probable error, the statement doesn't stand without citation. Here's some information about the 1922 Wallal/Wollal eclipse observations (by astronomers of Australia and of Lick Observatory). It was announced in May 1923 that their observations did indeed confirm Eddington's inconclusive measurements of light 'bending' during the Solar eclipse of May 29, 1919. Maybe this image can help determine if the B. Virginis assertion is correct. This page includes a couple of possibly helpful references, and states that "it was the measurements from these plates that finally led to H. Spencer Jones of Greenwich Observatory announcing in May 1923.... Twang (talk) 01:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Beta Virginis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100819122914/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_t_z.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_t_z.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100810114313/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/e_research_chinengstarzone_b.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/e_research_chinengstarzone_b.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070402122658/http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/zavijava.html to http://www.astro.uiuc.edu/~kaler/sow/zavijava.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beta Virginis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023075846/http://www.citebase.org/fulltext?format=application%2Fpdf&identifier=oai%3AarXiv.org%3Aastro-ph%2F0502014 to http://www.citebase.org/fulltext?format=application%2Fpdf&identifier=oai%3AarXiv.org%3Aastro-ph%2F0502014
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
In literature
editHow about a section for references to b virginis in literature? Poul Anderson. Tau Zero as a starter. Plewis (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)