The section, as it had stood, cribbed a summary from Colin Temple’s blog, attributed it to Leibniz, and then explained it very poorly. I have replaced this by a quotation of the actual section of the Monadology that Colin referenced, and more detailed explanations. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
All of the content of that section was either irrelevant to the "best of all possible worlds" theory, or already stated in my updated first section. It may have been interesting stuff to the Leibniz student, but it did not belong here. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
