Talk:Best New Zealand Poems

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability, NPOV edit

This article is basically a summary of another website, and has only ever had input from one user. In addition, all references are sourced from teh website itself.

A cursory look reveals that it repeatedly lists many of the same people (not all of whom have been given their own pages yet) and, in 2006 at least, they were drawn from only a handful of sources.

Is this incestuousness something to do with New Zealand in general, or are we looking at a small partisan website here, in which case we need better NPOV?

I think we need to explain why the website is notable. Does it put out a print publication?

T Walker 57 00:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Best New Zealand Poems series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply