Talk:Bessie Love

Comment moved here from the article page

Something is strange. If she was born in 1898, how could she have been a WAMPAS Baby Stars in "1922"? User:204.91.248.42

According to the article they were baby stars ( i.e. thier stardom was in it's babyhood) not babies who were stars. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 21:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Additional changes

Removing Georgia Pearce completely from this page. It is also not mentioned in her autobiography, which includes a filmography.

Although the LA Times obit lists Bebe Daniels and Blanche Sweet among her bridesmaids, Love’s autobiography does not list them, nor are they in the book's captioned photo of the bridal party.

I streamlined additional unevenness in her biography. Following the war, she moved to Britain and worked on the stage and in films that were made there. She did not move back to the US to work in film.WikkanWitch (talk) 03:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bessie Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150822130955/http://www.silentsaregolden.com/arneparamountpictures.html to http://www.silentsaregolden.com/arneparamountpictures.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bessie Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520190837/http://silentsaregolden.com/arneuniversal.html to http://www.silentsaregolden.com/arneuniversal.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

B-class review

I believe this article meets the requirements for B-class. With just a little more work, primarily in the introduction and early life sections, it could be nominated for GA-class.

1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations ✔
2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies ✔
3. The article has a defined structure ✔
4. The article is reasonably well-written ✔
5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate ✔
6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way ✔

--Nannochloropsis (talk) 22:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)