Talk:Bernheim Arboretum and Research Forest
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T.Wang_ex_Cheng.JPG){kind=small}
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Arboretum edit
Wikipedia is not an indescriminate collection of data, would anyone care if I removed the lengthy list of the aboretum's holdings? It's all available on the official webpage. --W.marsh 18:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm all for taking the list of species in the arboretum out. Kyhiking 01:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
The reference link is broken edit
The following link from references is broken http://www.bernheim.org/Default.aspx?tabid=74 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.200.127.165 (talk) 17:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I updated it. Thanks for the note. --W.marsh 18:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bernheim Arboretum and Research Forest/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| I rated this as 'Start' rather than 'B' as the article contains a good deal of seemingly subjective language in it as well as things that probably should be cited. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 18:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bernheim Arboretum and Research Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091130070643/http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/05/mcdonough_slideshow200805 to http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/05/mcdonough_slideshow200805
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150910111900/http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2013/02/25/beavers-bring-their-engineering-skills-to-bernheim-creek-restoration/ to http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2013/02/25/beavers-bring-their-engineering-skills-to-bernheim-creek-restoration/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 5 February 2018 (UTC)