Talk:Berlevåg Airport/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 20:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

• No DAB links, no dead links, files check out.

• References 4 and 21 are in Norwegian. References 22 and 23 are PDFs.
  • Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

• The airport served 5,949 passengers in 2012 and was the Avinor airport to receive the most subsidies per passenger. How about and received the most subsidies per passenger of any Avinor airport. Perhaps link subsidies, I assume this means money the government gives for the airport to operate?
  • Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

• Note in the lead why these have been placed on hold.
  • I've reformulated a bit, but the problem is that the sources don't state the obvious: why would a fishing village of 1000 people need Norway's second-longest runway? Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Airlines and destinations

• Looks good.

Accidents and incidents

• On 11 March 1982 Widerøe Flight 933 crashed into the Barents Sea between Berlevåg and Mehamn Airport, killing all fifteen people on board the Twin Otter. Perhaps split the sentence and add that it was the third stop of the flight. Also consider linking conspiracy theory.
  • Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

I will review the "history" section when these are responded to. Albacore (talk) 21:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

All done. Arsenikk ^(talk) 13:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

History

• With state funding the airport was upgraded to meet the regional airport standard, which were completed in 1974. Hard to follow here, and ambiguous, were the standards complete in 1974 or the construction of the airport?

• Norving applied to operate the subsidized regional routes in Finnmark, including to Berlevåg,[16] Widerøe was awarded the concession in 1973. Rewrite or reword sentence. Also, what do you mean by "awarded the concession"?

• Expand and link NOK

• Avinor stated in 2012 that they saw no reason to look further into these plans A period and a reference are needed.

I will pass once these are responded to. Albacore (talk) 14:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

All four issues have been fixed. Thank you for the review. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)