Talk:Bennett Building (New York City)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 16:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

• It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
• It contains copyright infringements -
• It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
• It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links

• References look good. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• Notes are cited. Great work. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Prose

Lede

• The caption (2010) in the infobox, could we expand? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done
• It has three street addresses: 93-99 Nassau Street, 139 Fulton Street, and 30 Ann Street. - why? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Added
• Farnsworth to design two additions - I feel a word is missing, perhaps two changes? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Fixed Changed to "expansions". epicgenius (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• The original mansard roof was demolished and the top four stories were added from 1890 to 1892 - The original mansard roof was demolished to allow four additional stories to be added from 1890 to 1892 Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done
• disappeared in 1898, - is this disappeared as in the mafia sense? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Not quite, he just ran off and no one heard of him again. epicgenius (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

General

• Is frontage a real word? I've never seen it before Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Added a link to frontage. It's used in architecture and real estate to describe how much of the lot perimeter faces a road or another lot. epicgenius (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• Bennett Building was described as being probably the world's tallest building - by whom? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done
• same era below Canal Street, - I'm assuming below is North? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Fixed "below" is "south" in Manhattan parlance. I sometimes forget that the vast majority of people are not familiar with NYC geography. epicgenius (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• mansard roof, James M. Farnsworth, Temple Court Building, are duplinks. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Removed
• everything is well sourced :). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• No copyvio found. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• Plaque - is this subsection needed? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• Actually that whole section seems a bit trivia. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Removed
• Is there a reason we denote the Design section above history? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  • A lot of articles that I've expanded have used this layout. I often find it easier to describe the structure itself before going into the historical details of when these features were installed, because the design context is already established. epicgenius (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
• Caption "Seen in 1893" - could we expand? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done
• Pettit disappeared in mid-1898- any more info on this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Added
• Could we get some WP:ALT? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Not much here to nitpick. I've put on hold to address the few comments above Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. I've resolved these comments now. epicgenius (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the quick responses. Happy to support. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)