Talk:Bene Ephraim

Untitled

changed "re-emergence of this community" to "emergence of this community". I have no doubt of their sincerity or desire to be Jewish, and to be recognized as such, nor do I doubt that they devoted to Judaism in practice and affiliation. However, from what I understand of them, there is no evidence of their having had Jewish antecedents. Therefore, they should be actegorized as a group of Telugu-speaking Indians who are seeking to become Jewish.ShmorgelBorgel 16:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Tomer^talk 10:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

In retrospect, I should change my "agreed" to "I agree, inasmuch as they seek recognition as Jews", to clarify that I take no position on the il/legitimacy of their historical claims. I have insufficient data to support or disregard their claims, only insufficient data to validate them. Tomer^talk 09:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Needs more sources

Relies much on Kulanu website, which has been unavailable. Other sources should be used.Parkwells (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bene Ephraim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150910083251/http://www.kulanu.org/india/bneiephraim.php to http://www.kulanu.org/india/bneiephraim.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)