Talk:Beitou District

Name

Is the director's name really spelled that way?--Jerrypp772000 20:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

According to [1], the spelling in itself is correct, but Lee is the family name (look at the picture, not the text). For some reason, the city government mixed it up ... --61.220.29.74 (talk) 02:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 29 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Number 57 22:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

---

Beitou → Beitou District – It appears to me that there is pretty much a consensus in practice that Taiwanese cities' districts should have the article title of "Foo District." (See Category:Districts in Taiwan.) In fact, all other districts in Taipei (see Category:Districts of Taipei) follow this. (The category currently contain some articles, such as Maokong, which do not follow this, but places like Maokong are actually not districts.) I believe that consistency here is a good practice. --Relisted.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Nlu (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

• Oppose per WP:UCN (use common names) and a majority of points at WP:NAMINGCRITERIA (Naturalness, Precision, and Conciseness). Using "District" as a disambiguator is a good idea for generic districts like Zhongshan and Zhongzheng that have no notability except as administrative districts but Beitou has a storied history (going back long before it was a district and even before there was a Taipei) and is notable in English literature as the town/resort/suburb/&c. of "Beitou" not as merely "Beitou District". A review of mentions in these Google Books results and this ngram result show this. —  AjaxSmack  02:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

• Support The Chinese article describes it as Beitou District. We are here to present encyclopaedic content which arguably does not involve pandering to inconclusive Western usages. GregKaye 13:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Chinese-language usage should not dictate English Wikipedia titles per WP:UE. Chinese Wikipedia has titles like "Taipei City", "Penghu County", "Beijing City", and "Hunan Province" whereas English eschews these suffixed unit names (i.e. uses Taipei, Penghu, Beijing, and Hunan). Different languages differ, and assuming by "Western" usage you mean English, usage is conclusive as the Google results linked above show. —  AjaxSmack  04:30, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • "Google results" in this case is going to be skewed, because "Beitou" is a substring of "Beitou District," and prosaically, even if it were true that "Beitou District" were considered by people to be a more proper way to address it, prosaic style would call for a reference to "Beitou District" as a first reference and then "District" being optional in second and subsequent references. (I am sure, for example, that you would not demand that Fuxing District, Taoyuan - in which certainly "District" would be required – be never referred to as "Fuxing.") The fact that Beitou is referred to in isolation without "District" all the time is not the same as demanding that its more formal usage be "Beitou District." That would be counterintuitive. (In fact, a number of the first references that your Google search link yielded used "district of Beitou" which I would contend is effectively an equivalent of "Beitou District" rather than simply "Beitou" - prosaically.) The ngram is useless because it actually doesn't seem to pick up the "district or no district?" distinction; it graphed Peitou (which we would now deprecate because it is Wade-Giles, now disfavored) and Beitou, for sure, but no one is advocating here that we use "Peitou." --Nlu (talk) 17:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beitou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ptjh.tp.edu.tw/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612140458/http://www.mdjh.tp.edu.tw:80/ to http://www.mdjh.tp.edu.tw/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beitou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521055524/http://green.asus.com:80/english/download/ASUS_CSR-Report_2007_EN.pdf to http://green.asus.com/english/download/ASUS_CSR-Report_2007_EN.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)