Talk:Behind the Camera: The Unauthorized Story of Three's Company
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Behind the Camera: The Unauthorized Story of Three's Company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Note on the dates
editI'd leave the note "Even though these dates ought to be accurate, there is something odd. As a narrator of the movie, Joyce DeWitt says "...two shows, every Friday, 8 years...". Yet, the dates where Somers is said to have missed the second and third tapings are on Sundays.". It tells the readers that these dates may not be that accurate. -- Lyverbe 11:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- That text reeks of original research, so unless a source can be found that documents that discrepancy I would leave it out. — OcatecirT 15:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Errors section
editI haven't seen the movie, and i have a question: during the wrap party, did they specifically say that people were liking it already, or did they just say vague stuff like "it looks like this will be a success"? Becuase if it was never outright stated that they knew everyone would like the show because of how well the first few episodes were recieved, they could just be saying that they liked the show themselves, and that it seems like something that could take off. 74.192.250.56 (talk) 23:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Trivial Discrepancies
editSome of the listed discrepancies seem rather nit-picky and trivial. Without reading it carefully, it makes the film seem inaccurate even though it is accurate overall on the major details. Perhaps change the opening of that section to say something like "The film is inaccurate with some small details" Sacr1fyce (talk) 17:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Some of them are indeed "small details" but some are more important to mention. But, hey, I'm fine with your suggestion to change the opening. -- Lyverbe (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)