Talk:Before Present
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Before Present article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 4 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Before present. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
CETERUM CENSEO
editceterum censeo ... that - the "present" ever meant and still means "today" and not 1950, - which latter, in case of radiocarbon dating, might be named "BL" in honour of Libby, otherwise "BFN" (Before Nineteen-Fifty), similar to "b2k" in icecore datigs, - consequently, those "intelligent" "scientists" would live today in the year 60 AP (after present)! In addition, and usually in the same papers, the time scales - if only for better comparability - must run chronologically from left to right, i.e. from the older to the more recent data (unfortunately, too many people seem to be completely incapable of using their plotting programs correctly). Further: Please note that neither ky nor kya are allowed SI-units of time. The only correct ones are "a" for year, or "ka" for thousand years. Please refer to "Unified code for Units of Measure at http://unitsofmeasure.org.HJJHolm (talk) 15:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect ("Radiocarbon dating") date
editAs of the current revision of the article ("Before_Present"), the first sentence in the section "Before Present#Radiocarbon dating" says:
Radiocarbon dating was first used in 1940.
That does not seem to be correct. For one reason, the article about "Radiocarbon dating" -- (which that sentence itself contains a link to, and seems to rely upon) -- says (in the first sentence of its second paragraph)
The method was developed in the late 1940s at the University of Chicago by Willard Libby.
For another reason, the article about "Willard Libby" says, in its FIRST sentence, that
Willard Frank Libby (December 17, 1908 – September 8, 1980) was an American physical chemist noted for his role in the 1949 development of radiocarbon dating, a process which revolutionized archaeology and palaeontology.
It seems obvious to me that something (radiocarbon dating) which did not exist until its "1949 development", did not get used in 1940.
Perhaps it was a TYPO? Maybe it should have said "1950" -- ? --
Any advice or other comments? Thanks, from Mike Schwartz (talk) 06:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- 1940 is clearly wrong. But what is the correct answer? 1949? 1950? 1950s? No citation for first use is given. So you just volunteered to find the citation! 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 07:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was 1949. I've corrected the date and added citations, taken from the radiocarbon dating article. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you ... e.g. for this prompt [and helpful] response:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Before_Present&diff=1164473263&oldid=1164183773
- Resolved– case closed
- --Mike Schwartz (talk) 16:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- It was 1949. I've corrected the date and added citations, taken from the radiocarbon dating article. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:08, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Link to egocentrism
editThis article should link to the page egocentrism as the likely cause for the appearance of this time scale. Should we create a dedicated section on the causes, or put it near the beginning of the article? 2A01:CB08:5F:8700:329C:23FF:FEA2:DF4F (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- We would need a reliable source to do this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
AD vs CE
editShould the references to AD (Anno Domini, a religious designation) be changed to CE (Common Era, a more neutral one), or is this appropriate when talking about the Gregorian calendar, created by the Catholic Church? Scyg (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- See MOS:ERA. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Overview of the chaos
editHere is an excellent overview of the existing chaos and the inability of scientists, science journals and universities to agree on a uniform and unambiguous term (partly in German): https://www.sedgeochem.uni-bremen.de/kiloyears.html. Good luck! HJJHolm (talk) 07:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)