 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
notability
editA collection of literature edited by Moorcock and then complied and re-edited and published in the 1975's soundes inherently notable to me. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 22:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, to me it doesn't sound so. Per WP:BK, a book is not inherently notable only because of his author, unless the author is so historically significant that his "life or works is a subject of common classroom study." Is that the case here? In any case, independent sources on the subject are what would make it notable. --B. Wolterding 16:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Go ahead and delete it then ; I don't care. I've salvaged my work for the Moorcock wiki in any case. You might want to delete the England Invaded article as well. Demos99 (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)