Talk:Bee removal
Latest comment: 2 years ago by DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered in topic Redundancy
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Gbawden (talk · contribs) on 16 October 2017 with the comment: A case of WP:NOT - not a how to nor a dictionary It was contested by Syrenka V (talk · contribs) on 2017-10-20 with the comment: This article resembles neither a HOWTO nor a dictionary definition |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Vandalism edit
This page has been making the rounds on Reddit and now YouTube for it's somewhat laughable intro sentence so expect some increased anon vandalism... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 00:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Pointless Article edit
I feel tired article is rather unneeded and suggest it glitter removal. Everything here can already be found on the beekeeping article. (I'm currently on mobile rn so I have no clue how to create hyperlinks here Rae Dreemurr (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Redundancy edit
The first sentence clearly violates WP:REDUNDANCY, but I'm not sure how to rephrase it QoopyQoopy (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yep you're absolutely right QoopyQoopy – it was an egregious example of the much-loathed formula
X Y Z is a Z of type Y in location X
or whateverthehell. I have ripped out most of the first sentence so now it is inelegant but works a little better. Whether the encyclopaedia desperately needs this article to exist at all is another question for another time ... for now, though, thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 01:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)