Talk:Bedford, Western Australia/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi - I'll make copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jot queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Prosesize is only 15kb, so room for expansion if needed :)
As of 2021, the local group continue to pursue native title rights over the suburban region, including Bedford- worth expanding if any extra information is available.
It was decided that the housing commission did need to built shops- "build"?
The expanding population also caused the Catholic Church to establish a primary school on Wood Street in Bedford. A Catholic church was already existent in the suburb, and so St Peter's Primary School was constructed next to the church.- can be streamlined into 2 or 1 sentence
By the early 1970s, the development of Bedford was complete, the last road being Gummery Street in the suburb's north- ok this is the last street, but not sure that holds for development as a whole....?
Maybe the Name section should go further up the page...? Near establishment?
The school moved down the street to a new site in 1942, that being its current site- why not just "The school moved down the street to its current site in 1942"
Looks pretty comprehensive overall. A nice read. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
I have addressed each of your suggestions. Steelkamp (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
NB: earwigs copyvio is clear
If possible, add when the trams stopped running down Beaufort St.
I guess - anything on most expensive residence sold (just thinking about giving as big a nudge as possible to FA-hood) - if no source nevermind...
Nothing else newsworthy ever?
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall: