Talk:Beazley Medal

Latest comment: 4 years ago by FatCookies123 in topic Beazley Medal
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Beazley Medal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Beazley Medal

edit

Hi everyone,

Evaluating the article "Beazley Medal."

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. There is nothing that distracted me from reading it.

None of the information is out of data, and the article does not seem to be missing anything that could be added.

I would criticize the fact that the article does not have pictures of the previous winners.

The tone was neutral, and none of the claims are biased.

No, I think the author(s) of the article represented it clearly and concisely.

The links do work, and the sources support the claims in the article.

Each fact is cited correctly, and the information comes from neutral sources.

On the talk page, there are conversations going on about how to represent this topic and the last edit was made on december 17, 2018.

The article is not rated and it is not apart of any WiKiProkects.

Wikipedia does not discuss the topic any differently than we would in class.

FatCookies123 (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Michael Del GrossoReply