Talk:Beautiful Creatures (2013 film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by A Karley in topic Different Edits?

Flop

edit

An editor objects to this film being called a flop. Particularly objecting to the [intro calling it a flop, and does not accept that Forbes is a good enough source to say it is a flop, despite only earning slightly more than its production budget. -- 109.78.24.155 (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

How is this not a flop? Half of ticket sales go toward theaters. Also, production budget doesn't include marketing costs. Practically speaking for a film to break even it would need to earn 2-2.5 times its production budget. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:6351:6300:D5B4:E250:B0E8:EBB8 (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Different Edits?

edit

I'm just watching the film and finding that the plot as described is severely out of sequence with the version I'm watching. Same events, different order. Are there two edits going around? AKarley (talk) 12:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Beautiful Creatures (2013 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply