Talk:Bear Creek (San Francisquito Creek tributary)

Topology in dispute

According to USGS map Bear Creek flows directly into San Francisquito Creek, and not through Corte Madera Creek.

• Yes, it is the confluence of Bear Creek and Corte Madera Creek that is the source of San Francisquito Creek. I will add ref and make this more clear.Schmiebel (talk) 17:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bear Creek (San Francisquito Creek). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http%3A%2F%2Fviewer.nationalmap.gov%2Fviewer%2F to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bear Creek (San Francisquito Creek). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807063241/http://www.woodsidetown.org/PDF/Woodside_creeks_flyer.pdf to http://www.woodsidetown.org/PDF/Woodside_creeks_flyer.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807063241/http://www.woodsidetown.org/PDF/Woodside_creeks_flyer.pdf to http://www.woodsidetown.org/PDF/Woodside_creeks_flyer.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Bear Creek (San Francisquito Creek)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Bear Creek (San Francisquito Creek)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "survey":

• From Guadalupe River (California): Durham, David L. (1998). Durham's Place Names of California's San Francisco Bay Area: Includes Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, Solano & Santa Clara counties. Word Dancer Press, Sanger, California. p. 639. ISBN 978-1-884995-35-4.
• From Adobe Creek (Santa Clara County, California): Durham, David L. (1998). Durham's Place Names of California's San Francisco Bay Area: Includes Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, Solano & Santa Clara counties. Word Dancer Press, Sanger, California. p. 591. ISBN 1884995357.
• From Hale Creek: Durham, David L. (1998). Durham's Place Names of California's San Francisco Bay Area: Includes Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, Solano & Santa Clara counties. Word Dancer Press, Sanger, California. p. 639. ISBN 1-884995-14-4.
• From Waddell Creek (California): Donald Thomas Clark (1986). Santa Cruz County Place Names. Santa Cruz, California: Santa Cruz Historical Society. p. 331.
• From Permanente Creek: Erwin G. Gudde; William Bright (1949). California Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. p. 258.
• From Corte Madera Creek (San Mateo County, California): Durham, David L. (1998). Durham's Place Names of California's San Francisco Bay Area: Includes Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, Solano & Santa Clara counties. Word Dancer Press, Sanger, California. p. 44. ISBN 1-884995-14-4. Retrieved 2010-08-30.
• From Stevens Creek (California): Durham, David L. (1998). Durham's Place Names of California's San Francisco Bay Area: Includes Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, Solano & Santa Clara counties. Word Dancer Press, Sanger, California. p. 707. ISBN 1-884995-14-4. Retrieved Jan 1, 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)