Talk:Bay of Plenty (National Provincial Championship)

Rugby union Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Bay of Plenty Rugby Union on 2020-09-03. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was No mergers.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I am proposing that BOP Steamers be merged into the BOPRU page so that they follow the precedent set by the other RU's in NZ. Furthermore templates such as the Air NZ Cup one link to BOPRU and not BOP Steamers as they probably technically should. Mattlore (talk) 00:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Support, per other rugby unions in New Zealand. – Liveste (talk • edits) 01:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree - certainly pointless having two articles. BTW do we have a reference as to when the name steamers was adopted? dramatic (talk) 08:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

This issue has come up again as the Steamers page has been re-created without discussion. Mattlore (talk) 01:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)\Reply

Since the situation is different now (as previously both pages were the same, now they're separate pages for separate entities), I think a new round of voting is in order, hence I have placed my vote in a new section. Gialloneri (talk) 12:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge (Second round) edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Disagree* - I was all for the merger before the re-creation, however this was when the BOPRU page effectively was a Steamers page. Since they are both separate entities and both articles are written as such, they merit separation. Case in point - NZRU and All Blacks are not the same page. I'd also suggest re-linking where appropriate (urgh), ie Steamers for the NPC templates/pages, BOPRU for instances such as the NZRU page. Also should probably note that I am a Steamers fan, but I'd vote the same if the same work was done for the Lions/Taniwha/Turbos etc. Gialloneri (talk) 12:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merge. I'm in the same waka. The first time 'round I supported merging because that's what was done with the other provincial unions. But now there seems to be enough information to support separate articles on these two related but distinct organisations. I'm a Steamers fan too, but I'd also support the creation of separate articles for individual Air NZ Cup teams. Cheers. – Liveste (talk • edits) 08:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Comment. I agree somewhat, I think if this page is to stay then someone needs to go through and sort out the templates properly. This page has had a lot of work done on it since I (re)proposed the merge, and I think in its current for it could probably stay. It just needs to be sorted out properly. And I'm glad a discussion has started rather than just editors deleting the template (not that it was you guys) Mattlore (talk) 10:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the merge template from Bay of Plenty Rugby Union, as there hasn't been any real support for a merger this time around. Cheers. – Liveste (talk • edits) 23:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal (September 2020) edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was no merger. After discussions here, here, here and in the past the main consensus is for Mitre 10 Cup sides to have separate pages from their unions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I propose to merge Bay of Plenty Steamers into Bay of Plenty Rugby Union. This would put this page back in line with other Mitre 10 Cup sides. The current squad and history can easily be merged into the main Bay of Plenty rugby union page (with some added sources for verification) to match other Mitre 10 pages. Stadia information can be added and a more compact previous season history can also be added (similar to that on the Tasman Rugby Union page). I don't see why this side (and Auckland rugby union team which I'm also requesting a merge for) should be different from other sides. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note: We're over 10 year since the page had a previous merge proposal, in that time no other pages have been created as separate entities for Mitre 10 Cup sides. As this hasn't been done, I believe a merger would be appropriate for the reasons I've suggested above. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic