Talk:Battle of the Camel/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Extremely biased, extremely unwikipedia like
This is one of the most anti wikipedia article I have come across. It is a definite candidate for speedy deletion. Can some admin help me finish it out/delete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Velanthis (talk • contribs) 17:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
truth hurts :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.179.128 (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Complete Lack of references, obviously extremely biased, an attack on a historical figure, cannot be turned neutral, please delete.
Completely and Absolutely Un-Neutral Point of View in this Article.
This is one of the most unneutral articles i have ever read in my life. Will be subject to deletion if not balanced immediately. --85.154.167.40 (talk) 14:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Najh Al Balagha is considered inauthentic by Sunni Muslims
"Sunni scholars do not regard the Nahj al-Balagha as authentic." from the wikipedia page of Nahj Al Balagha, so why then is it cited for the "Sunni View" of the battle? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FullMetal234 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)