Talk:Battle of the Assunpink Creek/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mattisse in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It seems to be very well organized and clearly written and referenced. I have noticed only a few small glitches listed in comments below.

Comments
  • As the British approached, Fermoy returned to Trenton, drunk. - I believe this is the only mention of Fermoy. He needs some identification as to his role.
  • One soldier said "the bridge looked red as blood, with their killed and wounded and their red coats. - there is no closing quotation mark.
  • I did a little copy editing and added the cite book format to one of your references.

That's it!

Mattisse (Talk) 19:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done.-Kieran4 (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


Final GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written   b (MoS): Follows MoS  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced   b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable   c (OR): No OR  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Sets the context   b (focused): Remains focused on subject  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: NPOV  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Very nice article. Congratulations!

Mattisse (Talk) 21:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply