Talk:Battle of Szack

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Undiscussed move edit

This article was recently moved from battle of Szack to battle of Shatsk without discussion or an explanation. English sources prefer Szack, as "Battle Szack 1939 -wikipedia" on Google Print gives us 382 hits, whereas "Battle Shatsk 1939 -wikipedia" gives us 4. Per WP:COMMONNAME I am reverting this move and restoring the name that was stable for many years. Please use WP:RM. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Soviet Losses edit

- are taken from a delusional wartime propaganda polish article. Even the polish wiki now has quite different, much lower figures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.82.32.27 (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The issue has been adressed.Tvoi Ded (talk) 11:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Outcome edit

How was this a polish victory if a)the poles were forced to retreat b)they suffered far greater losses, than the Soviets (RKKA captured 1100 prisoners and killed hundreds more with the loss of ~200 men?) Appears to be a Soviet victory. Tvoi Ded (talk) 11:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Szack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply