Talk:Battle of Rhone Crossing

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Rhone Crossing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Africa: Tunisia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tunisia (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Classical Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Phoenicia Low‑importance

	Phoenicia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Battle of Rhone Crossing appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that before Hannibal crossed the Rhône River with his Carthaginian forces to battle the Gauls, he sent a detachment under Hanno, son of Bomilcar to cross at a different point upriver for an ambush?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/August.

Wikipedia

Consistency check

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Most remarkable article. However it need a consistency check, especially of the formatting but also of some of the content - got the right persons for those equivocal Roman names? On the formatting, we need "cite" templates on those notes - dates - (give full cites) and Lazenby appears a few times with different ISBN's - needs systematization. Also I note there are no refs to primary sources. And, some of the refs are still in parenthetical form. The content looks good and there are some nice pics. Attention to these fine points makes the diff between a top article and a sloppy one. Time is not of the essence so take some.Dave (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Souldn't this be the Battle of The Rhone or the Battle of The Rhone Crossing?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Because the current title isn't grammatical in my dialect, and probably isn't grammatical in most dialects of English. 96.231.17.143 (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Referencing problems

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Maglorbd, your recent edits introduced a couple dozen referencing errors to the article. I've fixed many, but I would appreciate your help in cleaning up the rest of the errors. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mikeblas Thank you for the assist. I have fixed the rest.Maglorbd (talk) 04:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Happy to help! :) There are still six more to fix. -- Mikeblas (talk) 05:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic