Moved here from the main article: "In this forgotten village we have two large monuments commumerating the war named after the two captains who lost there life here...i have reached and have taken the snaps of this town .....its a long dusty road from palur village u have one in two hour bus which takes you to this perticular town .....Dr Jahanzeb .........dr_jahanzeb@hotmail.com" --Dyss 18:42, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

dates and personalities

edit

Hi - - If this battle took place in 1757, it could hardly have been fought by Tipu Sultan, who was 7 years old that year. Is the date wrong or information about who fought it? - - Anon

Hi - - I see that in the earliest version of this page, the date is given as 1787. I am therefore reverting the date of this battle to 1787. - - Anon

The article is another evidence of this website NOT being neutral in displaying facts

edit

Evidence: (Introduction passage) " It was waged between two forces commanded by Tipu Sultan of the Kingdom of Mysore, and Colonel William Baille of the British East India Company. Baille was given only 1,000 reinforcements from General Munro. "

The final sentence is intentionally biased. It forces the reader to sympathize with the British and assume the fault of the defeat of Colonel William Baille was the lack of reinforcements rather than the fighting prowess of Tipu Sultan of Mysore. That such a sentence is placed in the introductory passage is itself suspect. A false sense of righteousness of the British in the 18th and 19th century has affected many authors who are sources for the article. But since 'Wikipedia' serves all the people of the world and not just British, it needs to place facts in an unbiased manner and not use the internet medium to proselytize nationalism. I would be grateful if you remove the justification part of the article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajjanajjas (talkcontribs) 07:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Pollilur (1780). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply