| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Nazareth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Battle of Nazareth has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 21, 2023. | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg)
.svg)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Nazareth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 00:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC) This review will commence in a bit. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 00:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Lead edit
Great, and very explanatory. A pass here.
Infobox edit
This is good. Passes.
Background edit
Both half sections look fine, as the reference at the end is consummate for the entire section.
Deployment edit
This section is also good. I have good feelings about this article!
Desert Mounted Corps objectives edit
Concise, and sufficient.
Esdraelon Plain edit
This section also passes!
Prelude edit
This mini-section looks good. I will continue tomorrow; so far, so excellent! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 21:49, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Desert Mounted Corps advance edit
Sets an expository stage for the next few sections; it passes.
5th Cavalry Division edit
Good section.
Approach to Nazareth edit
When you say "negotiated" the path, does that mean the subjects repaired or secured the passageway?
Everything else good.
Desert Mounted Corps plans edit
Solid section here.
Battle edit
How could the 18th Lancers have mistaken a little village for Nazareth, albeit Nazareth is a village itself. If you can, elaborate there.
Everything else is good.
- Sorry there is nothing more. It does sound like a lame excuse. --Rskp (talk) 23:58, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Nazareth edit
"As they continuing their attack..." As they were continuing their attack...
Everything else, very good.
Aftermath edit
I was just about to ask about the dearth of German/Ottoman accounts, but the first note expounded why this is the case. Anyway, a very nice section here.
Conclusion edit
This is one of the best articles I have reviewed, and in consequence one of the most engaging reviews. I truly did scrutinize the article and found just these few issues. When they are ameliorated, I can pass the article. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)