Talk:Battle of Ming Sha
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Daniel Quinlan in topic Primary sources
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Lie in the article edit
the number of Göktürks soldiers does not match the numbers given in the sources, And there is no consistency between the content of the article that reports a Kul tigin victory with huge Chinese loss and no information about seemingly light Turkic losses Frenchprotector29 (talk) 11:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Primary sources edit
This article, along with the others of the same ilk, uses unverifiable sources and has an over reliance on primary sources as well. This article should be assessed, sources verified, and rewritten properly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. @Gokturklerrr: Would it be possible to for you to improve the sourcing in the article? Also, could the Sorularla Eski Türk Tarihi citation be moved inline so we know which part(s) of the article are based on it? Finally, it would be helpful if you could include a quotation from Sorularla Eski Türk Tarihi since this is not an English source. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)