Talk:Battle of Maudach
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mr rnddude in topic B-Class criterion 1
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Maudach article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
CE edit
Did a cheeky little CE, tidied prose, awkward translations (?) - to – hyphenated isbns; rv as desired.Keith-264 (talk) 17:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
B-Class criterion 1 edit
- Auntieruth55; I have upped the article to C-class rather than leaving it in limbo. There was a citation needed tag placed, by me, on the end of a paragraph in the article. AustralianRupert has tentatively removed that CN tag and replaced it with the most plausible reference. When somebody gets the chance to verify the following passage and citation, upgrade to B-class;
Louis Desaix, commanding the left (northern) column of the Army of the Rhine and Moselle, had about 27,000 infantry and 3,000 cavalry when he crossed the Rhine at Maudach. He faced Petrasch's division of about a third of the size, including mixed troops of infantry and dragoons.<ref name=Dodge286/>
- Cheers, Mr rnddude (talk) 05:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- yes this is correct. auntieruth (talk) 15:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Cool, glad that's sorted. My apologies for my role in the delay in getting it to B-class. Normally I post B-class reviews on the article talk page, but, as I only had the concern with the citation style and one citation I didn't think it was necessary to put it here. I have, however, learned my lesson about that. Mr rnddude (talk) 15:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)