Talk:Battle of Kōan
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Is it really supposed to say "80 percent of the Mongol soldiers were either drowned or killed by samurai on the beaches." ? The 'were either drowned..' part makes it seem like the samurai's made the Mongols drown. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.140.235.37 (talk) 14:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
The entire article is written with an obvious japanese preference. Also the article would not suffer from less mentions of the Samurai or their swordmanship. . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.35.231 (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk)
Mongol-China-Korea edit
The main commander of the invasion is Mongol Shinedu. He cooperated with korean and chinese generals. It is unfair that only Mongol-chinese commanded the invasion.--Enerelt (talk) 02:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Annihilation of an army of 100,000 men? edit
"On seeing this circumstances, the Japanese army carried out an all-out attack. Korechika togo, Koretoo Togo, Sukekado Hujiwara and Nagahisa Shimadzu eliminated 100,000 soldiers."
Seriously? That sounds more like fantasy. Are there any sources for this which can be verified?--Anubixx (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
