Talk:Battle of Honnecourt
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Robinvp11 in topic Notes from WP:MILHIST B-class assessment
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Honnecourt article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notes from WP:MILHIST B-class assessment edit
@Robinvp11: this is otherwise easily B-class, but here's a few things that I noted while reading:
- I'm a bit hesitant with phrases like
relatively strong position
,disaster
,devastating
,euphoria
andappeared as strong as ever
. Consider indicating whether they are direct quotes from the authors you cite. If they are not direct quotes, I'd consider toning them down. - The phrase "
caused panic in Paris
" in the lede is not explicitly supported by the prose. - Similarly the lede phrase "
Melo was instead forced to confront
(emph. added) is not really supported by the prose, with the prose just saying he "Instead, Melo turned towards the North Rhineland, which had been controlled by French general Guébriant since defeating an Imperial army at Kempen in January.
" - Walloon links to a dab.
If you could fix those, I'll happily mark as B-class. -Ljleppan (talk) 08:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)