Talk:Battle of Hazir

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Help

edit

This article needs it. Such obvious bias in the writing, really below Wikipedia standards. From the article: "But they were up against the finest body of men of the time." Come on. Just one of many prejudicial sentences. Cutugno (talk) 22:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think it's not bias, but simply Khalid's Army assessment prestigious considering their already impressive record beating much more advanced military empires such as Byzantine and Sassanids. for the detail maybe its mentioning his personal Elite "mobile guard" Ahendra (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.136.149.11 (talk) Reply

The strength of the two opponents are not supported by any reference. As in many articles involving Byzantine battles, Byzantine army strength is exaggerate. I suggest to changes numbers to 'unknown' Oberoon (talk) 16:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good Article

edit

The other related battle articles should be like this. Misdemenor (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Hazir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply