Talk:Battle of Garibpur

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article needs a map edit

It'd be useful --AW 17:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

completely biased edit

a completely biased article. totally frm the indian point of view. nt 3 bt just 2 sabres were shot down. there werent 4 gnats there were 8 gnats. and 1 gnat was shot down. the sabres had flown 3 successful passes over indian tanks. indians admitted the loss of 7 t-55 tanks. and pkaistan lost 11 m-24 chafees. how cud the indians destroy 30 tanks wen only 1 pak sqdrn took part? the article needs ree assesment.

completely biased edit

a completely biased article. totally frm the indian point of view. nt 3 bt just 2 sabres were shot down. there werent 4 gnats there were 8 gnats. and 1 gnat was shot down. the sabres had flown 3 successful passes over indian tanks. indians admitted the loss of 7 t-55 tanks. and pkaistan lost 11 m-24 chafees. how cud the indians destroy 30 tanks wen only 1 pak sqdrn took part? the article needs ree assesment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.156.18.135 (talk) 08:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

no biasements allowed! edit

Pakistan lost 180 soldiers KIA, 30 tanks & 3 sabres destroyed in the BATTLE OF GHARIBPUR/BOYRA. 1 Indian battallion completely destroyed an entire Pakistani brigade supported by air & artillery. Indian losses were just 30 KIA & 4 tanks destroyed. OBJECTION:- first of all there were 2 Indian battalions( -jammu & kashmir and 2 sikh light), Indians had the support of 1 squd. of t-55 tanks. on the Pakistani side the "brigade" consisted of 2 companies of 22 FF and 38 FF and 1 squad. of m-24 chafee tanks. just 3 sabres took part in this battle and 2 were shot down, 8 folland gnats had taken part and 1 was shotdown. Pakistan lost 11 tanks while Indians themselves admitted losing 7 t-55 tanks. IS THE WIKIPEDIA DAY DREAMING?!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.156.18.135 (talk) 09:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Garibpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Garibpur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply