Talk:Battle of Chaeronea (338 BC)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2.197.252.196 in topic typo
Good articleBattle of Chaeronea (338 BC) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2010Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 2, 2010, August 2, 2013, August 2, 2017, August 2, 2019, and August 2, 2022.

Motives section edit

I replaced today a whole paragraph previously deleted in July ... "The Motives" with the explanation "it was wrong". It's not appropriate to simply delete all of someone else's work. If you know that it's wrong, then you have access to references that you can cite... when you get the time. Furthermore, if there's something wrong with it that needs discussion, that's what this page is for. Twang (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The text presented had nothing to do with the motives. It was just a description of the battle. Nevertheless, motives that led to this battle should be added.

GK1973 (talk) 11:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Casualties edit

Something is wrong with the casualties we propose for the Macedonian side. Where was this huge number taken from? Diodorus certainly does not state a number for the Macedonian losses, nor does Polyaenus or any other source I have read on the matter. Where did we find this number? It is very strange to propose that Philip's army sustained more casualties than the conquered... I will remove it until some source is given for this number. Diodorus states that there was great slaughtering, so I just substituted it with "relatively heavy", since this could mean anything from 100 to 1.000 men...

GK1973 (talk) 13:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tactical battle image compass error edit

The 'Battle-plan of Chaeronea' image is not consistent with the text. The Greeks had the river on their right flank and the mountains on their left. Also, the Macedonians would be coming from the north. So it seems the compass indicator should be reversed 180 degrees. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgonggr (talkcontribs) 15:19, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

vandalism edit

There is a sentence in the 'part of...' box that i can't find in the source to edit out. What gives? Can someone who knows wiki better than me fix? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.7.88 (talk) 19:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's probably vandalism of a template, therefore won't appear in the source page itself. But I can't work out where either. I've asked for ideas at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Lion of Chaeronea defaced!. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thematic appraisal edit

Is the list of events in the "Thematic appraisal" section showing up on anyone's browser improperly? For me, all the items in the list start with "1.", instead of being numbered in order (1, 2, 3, etc.). Is this just my computer, or is a mistake? Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

typo edit

there is a type where "distraction" should be replaced by "destruction" 2.197.252.196 (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply