Talk:Battle of Cape Gloucester/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 04:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


I'll do this tomorrow.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • No DABs, external links OK
  • No overlinking
  • Images appropriately licensed
  • Link mangrove swamp, Cape Gloucester at first use, Langilla, barge, round, battalion, regiment, anti-aircraft gun, flagship, minesweeper, bunker, Marston Mat
  • It was the second landing the US 1st Marine Division had conducted during the war, after Guadalcanal Awkward, perhaps a "thus far" somewhere?
  • at first but was slowed needs a comma after "first"
  • and in 1943 there were no roads "in 1943" reads to me like a dependent clause that needs commas, or you can move it to the end of the sentence.
  • 3,900 feet (1,200 m)) long
  • Perceiving that the Allies Believing
  • convert 3926 tons of bombs
  • as well as 12 destroyers as well as the task force flagship Awkward. Perhaps "escorted by..."
  • follow on troops hyphen between follow and on
  • The same for casualty receiving station and "rear area troops"
  • but ultimately a secondary route Why ultimately?
    • Removed ultimately. It was probably a product of my poor Australian English. AustralianRupert (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • and throughout the day the blocking position was attacked reverse these clauses
  • 266 for the Japanese Which, wounded or killed? Or both?
  • During final days of December "the" final
  • I have no idea where Razorback Ridge is, nor of any significance to it. I gather that a more-detailed map isn't available?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
    • Clarified in text. There is this map: File:Cape Gloucester - Map01.png, but I'm not sure about the licencing on that one so I wasn't game to use it. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
      • @Sturmvogel 66: G'day, Sturm, thanks for looking at this. I think I've addressed these points. These are my changes: [1]. Please let me know if anything else is required. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
        • That map looks like a derivative of the Cape Gloucester Landing map, anyway, so no loss. Your changes look good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply